Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut (1980/2006)

2986690_640pxStarring Christopher Reeve, Margot Kidder, Gene Hackman, Terence Stamp, Marlon Brando, Sarah Douglas, Jack O’Halloran, E.G. Marshall, Ned Beatty, Jackie Cooper, Valerie Perrine, Clifton James, Marc McClure

Directed by Richard Donner

Expectations: I’m so excited.

threehalfstar


So all those problems I wrote about in my review for the theatrical version of Superman II? Gone. The Richard Donner Cut is head and shoulders a better film, reconstructing the original vision for the follow-up story to the first film perfectly. It’s a true shame that Donner wasn’t allowed to finish this at the time, as it really could have led to a much better Superman series if they let him continue making them after the first two films. Donner expresses a long-gone desire for doing this in the “Making Of” featurette on the DVD, and you can see the pain in his eyes. Even so many years later, it’s still a sore subject.

Watching the two versions of Superman II shows perfectly how editing and context can completely change scenes. Where certain scenes in Superman II feel long and out of place, within the context of the Donner cut they make sense and work naturally with the flow of the movie. The story slowly builds, where in the theatrical cut everything seemed to slowly go nowhere. So much of the first hour of that movie is painfully disjointed, a result of the producers and Richard Lester needing to rewrite key scenes and doing a poor job of it. I find it interesting that without prior knowledge of what was what, I took the most issue with the two main sections they added: the Eiffel Tower and the extended Niagara Falls bits. I guess this doesn’t bode well for the upcoming re-watch of Lester’s Superman III, does it?).

superman2RD_1To be fair, though, some of what they do in The Richard Donner Cut could not have existed even if Richard Donner had been able to finish Superman II after the success of the original film. When tasked with finishing Superman for release, prior to completing filming on Superman II, Donner decided not to go with the original cliffhanger ending. He instead decided to cannibalize the written ending to Superman II, the “turn back time” ending. So if Donner had actually completed this in 1980, the opening and the ending would have needed to be somewhat different. So The Richard Donner Cut is actually working on two layers of fantasy: the fantasy of Richard Donner finishing Superman II, and doing so within a world where he was also not forced to finish Superman before filming on the two-film story was complete.

superman2RD_2Other than those added sections, my two main concerns with the theatrical version were how conveniently Superman gets his powers back and how the romance and relationship between Lois Lane and Superman/Clark Kent felt forced and flat. I was happy to see that both were resolved rather well here, thanks to a lot of structurally different scenes that bring the film back to the tone seen in Superman. Now the loss and regaining of Superman’s powers has weight and doesn’t feel like a contrived plot point to keep the story moving. No longer does Superman simply find the green crystal and POW! he’s Superman again; the scene is now the culminating moment of the Superman/Jor-El relationship and it’s one of the best moments in the film.

superman2RD_3The Lois Lane relationship is the biggest improvement, though. These scenes are basically the crux of Superman II, as one of the sequel’s main storylines is wholly focused on this relationship. So when just about all of these incredible scenes that build the relationship naturally are excised from the theatrical Superman II, and replaced with poorly re-written versions, it’s no wonder why Superman II is an underwhelming film in comparison. Seeing the original scenes as intended makes Superman II‘s story click into place, working off of the first film’s groundwork beautifully. Again, it’s amazing just how much a few scenes and some careful editing can do to a movie.

superman2RD_4The Richard Donner Cut is an essential piece to the Superman legacy, and I really have to give it up to everyone involved for bringing this together. Superman fans should rejoice at its release (and they probably already have, seeing as it came out seven years ago!). If you hesitate to watch this version because you think that it can’t possibly be that much better than the lackluster Superman II: it really is… by a lot. I still think certain aspects of the story are kinda wonky, but overall Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut is a phenomenal reconstruction of a never-finished near-classic. It’s like a whole different movie in a lot of ways, so definitely check it out Superman fans!


Imagine that, no legitimate trailer! Well… here’s the “Making Of” featurette I mentioned in the review!

6 comments to Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut (1980/2006)

  • This is one of the first films I wanted when I finally switched to BluRay. It’s so much better than the Lester version, which pales by comparison these days. Even taking into account the continuity issues (using the Reeve/Kidder screen-test, for example) and the impossible-to-fix plot problems, this is still a better film.

    Come to think of it, I’m gonna watch it again tonight, just for the hell of it.

    • I thought that screen test scene was great! It mixes in with the rest of the movie rather well. Hope you enjoyed watching it again, it really is a much better film!

  • It took me a while to watch this version, and it was the only original Superman movie that I actually purchased and I’m glad I got that one. It really is head and shoulders above the Lester cut of the movie, one other thing that I thought was great about the new version is how much different the fight scene in the city feels in this version. I personally felt that the Lester version had weaker wirework and aside from even the jokey parts he cut in, which have been removed here, and I thought that even the cuts they used were better than the ones used in the Lester cut.

    • Yeah there are a lot of subtle changes to that fight; it feels a lot more serious without all the Lester gags. I also liked the inclusion of the Statue of Liberty destruction too, great stuff. I wonder if they cut that out originally because they didn’t want to make it seem like NYC? Or does Metropolis have a Statue of Liberty too? I’m not up on my fictional cities.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  


+ 8 = 12

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>