Stephen reviews: Vampire Hunter D (1985)

Vampire Hunter D [バンパイアハンターD] (1985)

Starring Kaneto Shiozawa, Michie Tomizawa, Seizo Katou, Satoko Kitō, Kazuyuki Sogabe, Ichirō Nagai, Keiko Toda, Yuusaku Yara

Directed by Toyoo Ashida


Like many budding anime fans of the ’90s, I first saw this film when Cartoon Network aired it on television. And while I did eventually see the unedited version, it has been many long years since I last watched it. It hasn’t been quite as long since I read the novel it was based upon, which is easily available in English these days, but it has still been quite a few years, and my memories of both are a bit fuzzy. This was also my first time seeing the film subtitled, and as distant as my previous memories are, I noticed some odd translation differences in this version. Differently spelled names are nothing new, but I was interested in the way they referred to Dracula this time. In the other versions of the tale he is called the “noble ancestor” or “sacred ancestor” of vampires, but this translation calls him “ancestor god,” which conveys a slightly different view of outright worship and prayer rather than simple respect and looking up to him as an example.

As you might have guessed by the mention of Dracula, this film takes a more traditional Bram Stoker approach to vampires. In fact, the original novel by Hideyuki Kikuchi is dedicated to the cast of the 1958 Hammer film, Dracula. The main villain of Vampire Hunter D is Count Magnus Lee, and he looks every bit the classic vampire with a black cape and elegant clothes to match his calm and regal demeanor. His first appearance at the beginning of the film is ominous and sinister, with lightning flashes giving his face a completely different appearance, and it’s hard to decide which looks more frightening. I am glad that his victim, Doris, had the presence of mind to shoot him with her laser rifle. Her role is never more than the typical damsel in distress, but at least she isn’t a pathetic and helpless idiot. Not that Lee gives a crap. Like Darth Vader, he just lets the gunshots bounce off him. And in a contest between the two, my money might not be on Vader. Right from the first you know Magnus Lee is an indomitable force of evil.

After this Doris sets out to find a vampire hunter before she is turned into a vampire herself. It dawned on me this time that there is a hint of wild west in the way D rides out of the sunset with his wide-brimmed hat and poncho to save the day. And the dog-eat-dog, post-apocalyptic wasteland setting is not all that far off from a desert filled with desperadoes.

The plot follows the same basic path as the novel, though there are quite a few omissions of detail and explanation as well as some tweaking to fit the story into the timeframe, some of which are pretty significant. This is hardly unexpected for a film adaptation, but I couldn’t help being disappointed in D’s encounter with the snake women. He comes out of it looking like an all-powerful badass in the film, but in the novel there was a level of deception and manipulation that actually made D seem even more badass. But I’m not here to compare the two versions; I’m here to tell you if this is a good movie. And it is. The only time the film’s lack of explanation truly hurts it is when D’s hand starts eating dirt and sucking in air. I’ll spare you the head scratching and just let you in on the secret: He was trying to gather the elements of air and earth in order to cast a spell.

vampirehunterd_1That’s right, D’s hand eats things. In fact it sucks with gale force winds to capture whatever it feels like eating at the moment. And while it doesn’t spew oceans of blood (which would be a pretty dumb move when fighting a vampire), it does tend to spew snide remarks on a regular basis in a high-pitched, scratchy voice that you might expect to ooze from a dark alley trying to lure children with candy. What I love best about the hand, though, is that there is no attempt to explain or hide it. In this aspect, I like the film better than the novel which played up the mystery of whatever the hell it is without ever explaining it. But the film is more straightforward. D just so happens to have a face in his hand. Deal with it.

The film is overflowing with freakish stuff like that. This isn’t the movie where you sit around wondering what lurks behind the corner or in the shadows. Those kinds of movies bore the crap out of me, and thankfully Vampire Hunter D shows you every nasty deformed monstrosity it can. Shambling horrors that might be the main attraction in another horror movie are commonplace here, and D swats them aside as minor irritations rather than real threats.

The animation isn’t quite up to the task of showing all the action, but the directing is. This film is a great example of where skill can overcome technical limitations. And besides, this was a direct-to-video release in the ’80s, and it lives up to the standards of the era. My only real complaint about the visuals is that some scenes were too dark to see. I had several moments where I had to resist the urge to turn up the brightness on my TV, but that may be as much to do with the quality of the DVD as the quality of the film.

While we’re talking about the visuals I should mention Yoshitaka Amano’s character designs. Amano is probably best known in the west as the illustrator for most of the Final Fantasy games. While the animation is based upon his artwork, most of his style and technique were lost in the transition. It’s not that the character designs are bad, it’s just that they lack his distinctive flavor, which is sad since his illustrations for the series are wonderful at evoking its dank and creepy atmosphere.

vampirehunterd_2My biggest disappointment with the film, though, is right at the end. Magnus Lee is played up to be an unconquerable badass, and D is played up just as much. The final showdown between the two is filled with tension because you’ve seen just how unstoppable they both are, and their climactic battle is immensely gratifying. At least until it ends. Just when you’re really getting into it, it’s over. While it’s lots of fun, it finishes far too soon and left me wanting so much more.

But don’t let that dissuade you from checking it out. This is still a very well-made film with tons of dreary settings, a well-told plot, and some great monster slaying action that makes the most of what is has. It may have left me a bit unsatisfied, but I would rather be left wanting more from a film than wanting less. Vampire Hunter D is a great ride even if it isn’t flawless.

3 comments to Stephen reviews: Vampire Hunter D (1985)

  • Watched it. Loved it! For all these years I had thought that I saw this as a teenager, but absolutely nothing rung a bell, and whatever images in my brain I remember as being this film are definitely not this film. Maybe I watched the sequel? Who knows. Anyway, this movie is such a non-stop parade of badass, grotesque monsters and it’s such a delight to watch. I see why it became so popular. It also felt so comfortable and “right” to see an anime that has no chance of having CG. As I delve deeper into anime, I understand your position on this much clearer. I like both periods but there’s just something special about all hand-drawn stuff, but you already knew that.

    I loved D’s hand, and no explanation is necessary really. That’s the kind of shit that only gets bogged down with explanation. It’s a hand with a face that eats stuff, nuff said. I NEVER woulda put two and two together to figure out that D was gathering elements for a spell, but wow that’s cool!

    I also found the review able to hold a couple more screenshots so I added a couple that I took!

    • Stephen

      Yeah, this film is so much fun. Glad you got to see it. I wonder what was rattling around in your head masquerading as this. It could be the sequel, I suppose, but that came out pretty late to be from your teens. Visually, Bloodlust has much “cleaner” looking animation. It’s a digital production, and is one of the best looking ones out there, so the two films are kind of at opposite ends of the spectrum. It is definitely possible to make some really great looking digital animation (Bloodlust is proof enough of that), but I will always love the homespun charm of cell based animation.

      I, too, enjoy how mysterious D’s hand is. But man, I was confused as hell by that eating scene for years before I read the novel. That was probably the single best bit of extra knowledge to come from the book. I’m not sure how they could have put that into the film without bogging it down as you say, but I am glad I found out eventually.

      And of course more cool screen shots are always a good thing.

      • Who knows what that other movie is. I have the sequel from the library so I’ll soon find out if it was that. I think you’re right in that it came out too late to be it, but for some reason I feel positive it was a Vampire Hunter D movie. Are there any other animes with Vampire Hunter in the title? The sequel sounds promising, so I’m looking forward to it regardless.

        That bit of knowledge is huge, for sure! I guess D could have said something about gathering elements but just watching it works fine, even without explanation.

Leave a Reply! Comments are always much appreciated!