Jack Reacher (2012)

jackreacher_1Starring Tom Cruise, Rosamund Pike, Richard Jenkins, David Oyelowo, Werner Herzog, Jai Courtney, Vladimir Sizov, Joseph Sikora, Michael Raymond-James, Alexia Fast, Josh Helman, Robert Duvall

Directed by Christopher McQuarrie

Expectations: Really low.

threestar


The marketing for Jack Reacher — at least the one trailer I saw — did the film a disservice by playing up Tom Cruise’s badass character and completely avoiding the fact that the film is a mystery. Thankfully for me, I like mysteries and badass dudes so it was a win-win for me. But if I’m being completely honest, the main reason that I cared to see this one was Werner Herzog. My love for Herzog and his sweet, dulcet tones were enough to make me brave this movie for which the trailer instilled zero interest in me. Herzog is barely in the film and he’s only given one real standout scene, but that honestly didn’t matter so much as the film’s mystery is pretty fun to unravel.

But make no mistake: some of the stuff in this movie is flat-out preposterous. Like how Jack Reacher becomes involved in actively working on the case even though he’s a rogue loner with no agency affiliations. Sure, he used to be a military police officer, but “used to be” doesn’t usually cut it when it comes to investigating murder cases. If the movie wasn’t any good, you could really hinge a whole review on this moment as the point of no return. But the movie is pretty good, so we can overlook a couple of suspension of disbelief issues to get our guy into a few good movie situations.

jackreacher_2The film begins by showing us the crime at the heart of the tale. A sniper sets up in a parking garage and carefully sights his targets across the river in a city park. It’s a lengthy, tense, realistic bit of film that quickly gets you in the mood for a mystery thriller. The whole thing plays out with minimalist sound design and no dialogue, resulting in pure, visual filmmaking. Director Christopher McQuarrie has definitely come a long way since his previous film (which was also his directorial debut), Way of the Gun.

There are a few flaws that I think hold Jack Reacher back from reaching its true potential, though.  That sometimes preposterous plot will definitely roadblock some people, but I’ve already summarily dismissed that in the name of fun. The dialogue also feels a little too sharp and snappy, especially towards the beginning. This makes the characters feel like characters oftentimes, and that doesn’t do much to pull you into the movie and make you believe.

jackreacher_3My other major concern is that the Jack Reacher character is relatively hard to like. He’s seemingly from the same mold that delivered us many hard-edged, revenge-driven ’70s & ’80s action stars, the kinds of guys that only give a shit about completing their mission or protecting whatever’s in their best interest. While this works in those movies with no questions asked, in a modern film that tries to dole out as much drama as it does murder, the character feels a little out of place. Reacher does a lot of damage to both property and life during the course of the movie, and yet he’s held responsible for none of it. The story revolves around the investigation of an ex-military sniper who killed because he never got to “scratch his itch” in Iraq, yet Reacher is an ex-military man who kills mercilessly throughout the film and no one seems to mind much.

jackreacher_4In this way, the film almost feels like wish fulfillment for service members that wish they could take the law into their own hands. This is hammered home even more when rousing, heroic, superhero-esque music plays as Reacher’s theme. He’s not just on the case, he’s a hero out for justice! Which sounds like an ’80s tagline for a macho action flick, and that makes me realize something. With his back story and his current status as a drifter and a badass, Reacher is basically Rambo, and I never had any issue with watching Rambo have his way with hordes of enemies, so perhaps I should just lighten up. It is fun to watch Reacher do his thing, but within this modern context the reckless machismo just felt a bit much. But whatever, I can’t argue that Jack Reacher in Court would make for a better movie.

The film is also longer than it needs to be — or at least it felt that way — but I can’t deny that through these issues, Jack Reacher is still an entertaining, enjoyable experience. It’s not for everyone, and it’s definitely not that non-stop action movie that the trailer promised, but it does contain a pretty solid mix of fun thrills that rarely let up. It is also a fine mystery, something I haven’t seen in a while from a mainstream Hollywood film. I don’t think this one did well enough for a sequel, but I’d love to see what they could whip up.

7 comments to Jack Reacher (2012)

  • You make some great points, Will. The film does go longer than it needs to, and I thought it suffered from a considerable lack of energy in its pacing. I too thought Reacher wasn’t an easy man to like, although Cruise does a good job differentiating him from Ethan Hunt or many of the other one-man-army characters he plays. I did want him to crack a smile here and there, though.

    Overall, a solid but one-watch film for me. Good write up, man!

    • Thanks, Rodney. I agree, it’s a one-watch film for me too. The character is definitely different than other characters he’s played, and he does a good job at it, but I got the feeling that I was supposed to look up to him and wish I could do what he does, which felt odd. I don’t mind that he doesn’t smile because that character doesn’t seem too happy. It’s hard to pin down, but ultimately I think what matters is that the film is entertaining and fun for the most part. I generally dislike Tom Cruise movies, so I find it funny that I enjoyed this one even though his character was an unlikeable hard-ass.

  • I agree. It’s a longer than it needs to be film with a seemingly “above the law” immortal hero, but it’s still ridiculously fun. Plus, there are some car chase sequences that are some of the best I have ever seen. Gotta love practical effects. Also, for my own selfish reasons, I’d love for you to participate in an event I am running. http://cinekatz.com/the-cks-not-so-secret-santa-review-swap-in-july/

    • Definitely. It is a very fun movie, and the car chase stuff was pretty good.

      Hahaha, I saw that event a couple days ago and didn’t enter because I didn’t know what I would pick and I also didn’t want to pull something like Harry Potter out of the hat that I’d be forced to review. Hmm… but I guess I should enter. Might be fun.

  • Phil

    I enjoyed the movie and was kept entertained throughout. I expect this movie to be on FX or TNT in a couple years and while this isn’t a movie Id seek seeing again if I was bored and its on cable tv I may watch again. (unlike say, silver linings playbook).

    I was afraid the fight scene where Tom Cruise character drops his gun after cornering the top military bad guy was going to be this overdone cliched battle but it was to my surprise at the right length. However, the ‘good guy’ dropping his gun to slug away has been played out too much.

    I manage to overlook plot holes as the movie kept a good pace and kept you entertained and even wondering if who is the trader the DA or detective.

    • Hahahaha, it does seem like the perfect type of movie for a network like those. It may have done just OK at the box office, but I think it’ll find a new life on DVD and cable, perhaps enough to get a sequel off the ground. I’d definitely re-watch this over Silver Linings Playbook, although if I had a choice I’d watch something else over both of them!

      The fight was good, I agree. They did a good job of making the hand-to-hand stuff pretty quick and dirty. But yeah, this is a mainstream movie so there’s bound to be a few overused cliches. Thankfully it remained entertaining despite them.

Leave a Reply! Comments are always much appreciated!