Batman Begins (2005)

Starring Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson, Katie Holmes, Gary Oldman, Cillian Murphy, Rade Serbedzija, Rutger Hauer, Tom Wilkinson, Ken Watanabe, Mark Boone Junior, Morgan Freeman, Larry Holden

Directed by Christopher Nolan

Expectations: High. This is the third time around with this one.


When I first saw Batman Begins in 2005, I thought it was pretty good. I was impressed by it for sure, and I thought that Christopher Nolan was definitely the right man for the job. I had become a fan of his with Memento, so I was excited to see him ascend to the big leagues of cinema. I re-watched Batman Begins in 2008, right before seeing The Dark Knight in the theater, and found it to be better than I remembered. Re-watching it now, a couple of weeks after the release of the third and final Nolan Batman film, I am absolutely floored by how great it is. Batman Begins is a brilliant piece of work, expertly taking the Batman franchise and elevating it far beyond anything that Burton or Schumacher could have ever dreamed of doing. Nolan did the impossible: he made a Batman film that walks the line between realism and comic book thrills, without ever crossing the line into the schmaltz that categorized every film in the 1989-1997 series.

Batman Begins is exactly what the title suggests, an origin film for Batman. Instead of wasting half the runtime on setting up a villain that will only be vanquished by the end of the film, Batman Begins focuses on what makes Bruce Wayne and Batman tick. Batman doesn’t appear until an hour into the movie, but the story is so thrilling and well told that it doesn’t matter. I know I said in my review of Batman that I loved how they ditched the origin and got straight to the Batman, and I do, but the character setup on display here is flawlessly pulled off. It succeeds in making Batman a psychotic, tortured man with toys, but one that we care deeply about. His arc over the course of the film never lets up, keeping Bruce/Batman always at the forefront of our thoughts. And to have three villains, all of them largely unknown to the public at large, and then to not provide any of them with origins proves definitively that the current superhero movie formula that everyone else uses is null and void. Seriously, have any other filmmakers seen this movie?

I won’t bore you with a plot synopsis, and I won’t belabor the fact that Christian Bale is an excellent choice for Batman. In fact, the entire cast is stunning, filled with so many incredible actors that apparently the first two times through I was completely oblivious to the fact that Rutger Hauer was heading up the board of directors at Wayne Enterprises. Hauer doesn’t get a lot of screen time, but what he does get proves he should be getting better roles in Hollywood these days. Perhaps Hauer isn’t integral enough to warrant an entire paragraph here, but as I’m sure his role got virtually no press while the others have all had their due, I felt it was necessary to give a great, mostly unsung actor a shout-out.

The first hour before we see Batman is incredibly well scripted, bringing together multiple timelines all at once to tell a cohesive story of how Bruce Wayne got to the point of creating the alter ego of Batman. Never before in any superhero film has a superhero felt so real. Of course the whole idea is something of an unbelievable premise, but if you’re questioning the believability of Batman while watching a Batman film, you should probably watch something else. Anyway, the first hour is similar in ways to Nolan’s Memento, in that it deftly manages its many timelines to tell one patchwork story. The storytelling in Memento is much tighter and focused of course, but so is the overall story.

Having one of the villains be a crime boss is another stroke of genius that helps to ground the film in reality. Not to mention that shooting the film in Chicago, and allowing Gotham City to still mostly resemble Chicago, grounds the film even more. As much as I love the questionable time-frame of the previous series, Chicago makes the perfect Gotham City as is. I visited Chicago in 2004, a full year and a half before this film came out and while walking around downtown at night I couldn’t get over the overwhelming sensation I had that it was Batman’s domain. As I looked up at the smoke billowing out of the skyscraper’s roofs, I knew he was up there watching over the city. When the film finally came out and I saw that they had used Chicago, it had all come full circle; seeing the incredible helicopter shot of Batman standing on the edge of a skyscraper reminds me instantly of those feelings I had, and for me, elevates the film even higher.

But all this realism is also counterpointed by some of the most comic book shit to ever appear in a Batman film. The Scarecrow’s plot for instance? Holy shit! No lie, I had a set of 3 Batman vs. the Joker View-Master reels that had nearly the same plot, minus the microwave emitter. I haven’t watched the extras on the disc, but can anyone confirm for me that Nolan mentions sourcing the View-Master reels specifically? Actually, don’t tell me, I just want to keep that dream alive for as long as I can.

I also love the ending of the film. The monorail stuff is all exciting and thoroughly entertaining, but I’m speaking more specifically about the aftermath scenes. The destruction of Wayne Manor in the first movie is ballsy, and shows that nothing was held back. The carte blanche given to Nolan here is impressive on Warner Brothers’ part, and I pity the fool that has to follow in his footsteps. No one will be able to do justice to the work Nolan has put into the character, so I nominate Joel Schumacher to come back and give us a completely different take on his wild, neon Gotham, this time with a Nolan-influenced, realistic lean to it. I’m probably alone on that (and maybe I’m joking), but I just have one question for you naysayers: Why so serious?

One of the only faults I find with the film is Nolan’s filming of the hand-to-hand action. It’s all horribly shaky and much too close to everything for us to get a real sense of what’s going on. Some of this I can understand, as the intention in certain scenes is to make the Batman as mysterious to us as he is to the henchmen he drags away into the darkness. The flashes of fist and leg allow us to see Batman through their eyes, and I enjoy this fact, but in some scenes this logic just doesn’t hold true. I want to see some flow to the action, and it’s just not there. This led me to consider a Hong Kong-produced action film starring a true martial artist as Batman (perhaps Jet Li in his prime). While this could easily turn into a train wreck of a movie, that’s one train wreck I’d love to see… as if I don’t already see enough cinematic train wrecks around here (and I’m not talking about that dumb scene in Super 8).

Nolan must have felt like an absolute boss after watching the final cut of Batman Begins. It’s such a strong film, thanks in part to Nolan’s script, co-written with David S. Goyer. While that name might not be familiar with everyone (or perhaps it became familiar to some because of his work here), Goyer is a guy that started off very humbly with a script for the Van Damme film Death Warrant. That’s not a film you’d watch and spot greatness under the surface, and neither is Goyer’s work for Full Moon which includes Demonic Toys and Dollman vs. Demonic Toys. He later went on to do some quality work on Dark City, one of my personal favorite sci-fi films, before eventually finding his way to Batman. So the next time you see some shitty horror movie and you immediately think to ignore it as trash, some dude that got his start there might end up working on one of your favorite blockbusters in the future. Something to consider when so many immediately disregard low-budget filmmaking as worthless trash that should have never been made. Would we have Batman Begins without Demonic Toys? Maybe we would, who’s to say, but I like to think that one is dependent on the other.

Digressions aside, Batman Begins is a phenomenal movie. You knew that already, but it’s worth repeating. Nolan succeeds beautifully in crafting a film that manages to give us comic book thrills, realistic action and compelling characters. He also shows us Batman the inventor, Batman the investigator and Batman the avenger, instead of just Batman the one-note crime fighter as all previous films did. Batman Begins is an absolute triumph, and in my eyes, the best pure Batman movie of all time.

4 comments to Batman Begins (2005)

  • Great flick and great review Will. Obviously this one doesn’t get as much love as The Dark Knight does, but I still think it’s an awesome origin story that takes what we essentially believed about Bruce Wayne and gives it a darker edge. Will you be reviewing all of the Batman movies now?

    • Thanks! After watching all three in quick succession this one is easily my favorite, but I do enjoy them all quite a bit.

      And yes, all three Nolan films will have reviews here by the end of the week!

  • Stephen

    Like you, repeated watchings have only increased my enjoyment of this film. I don’t want to take anything away from how awesome Dark Knight is, but it’s a shame that this film seems to be in the shadow of its sequel. Batman Begins is a really great film that shouldn’t be forgotten just because its sequel was also amazing.

    That’s also kinda funny about Chicago, since it is Superman’s Metropolis city that I always thought was based off Chicago, while Gotham was based upon New York.

    • Yeah I think people focus on Dark Knight because of the Joker. Everyone loves the Joker and the fact that Ledger knocked it out of the park helps. Begins is a much purer Batman film, though, as Dark Knight sort of loses focus on the character a bit compared to this one.

      I always envisioned Metropolis as New York, and I used to think similar things about Gotham, but as soon as I was in Chicago at night Batman was literally the first feeling I got. It overwhelmed me, and so Gotham will always be Chicago to me now. I was sad to see that the 3rd film wasn’t shot in Chicago, but they did a good job of still making it feel like it was the same city from Dark Knight. I think both cities take things from both of the real cities, though.

Leave a Reply! Comments are always much appreciated!