Starring Val Kilmer, Tommy Lee Jones, Jim Carrey, Nicole Kidman, Chris O’Donnell, Michael Gough, Pat Hingle, Drew Barrymore, Debi Mazar, Elizabeth Sanders, Rene Auberjonois
Directed by Joel Schumacher
Expectations: High, but guarded. I was all about this shit in the 90s, but times have changed.
If I went into re-watching Tim Burton’s 1989 version of Batman with trepidation, then I pushed play on Batman Forever with abject terror. I was thoroughly obsessed with this film from the moment I saw it in the theater until a few years later. I bought the VHS the day it came out and watched it whenever I could get the chance. It had dropped during my (and the world’s) love affair with Jim Carrey, so how could I not love it? Anyway, that kind of love doesn’t generally translate well to adulthood, but I’m here to tell you that Batman Forever holds up admirably, for me anyway. It appealed to the wild sense of fun that I love to see films embrace, and while it definitely treads in over-the-top territory, it’s a sugary sweet, neon-tinged version of over-the-top that goes down just right.
After the debacle that was the story of Batman Returns, the general framework of Batman returns and provides us with something of a tried and true formula, but turned up a notch at every available opportunity. Now instead of the hot blonde seducing Bruce Wayne, she’s falling for both Wayne and Batman, creating something of a love triangle that mindfucks Bruce into rethinking his life. Two-Face is creating a menace in Gotham (no word on if he was also drinking his juice in the hood), and Edward Nygma quickly turns insane and starts dropping riddles after a failed conversation with his idol Bruce Wayne. The game is afoot, and all that…
So if you can buy into the style, this movie will never treat you bad. If, however, it immediately pissed you off when Alfred offers Batman a sandwich and Batman responds that he’ll get drive thru, then you’re in for a long ride. This is easily the most divisive Batman film of them all. Mostly I’ve heard nothing but shit about this one since growing up, and the Nolan films coming out haven’t helped its legacy any. There’s no way fans of only Nolan’s work will be satisfied with this film, but it’s not for them. This is the serious, but camp-focused Batman of Burton on overdrive with every exterior blasted with bright neon floodlights and every scene with the Riddler filled with trash one-liners. As a B-Movie fan, none of this bothered me, it actually allowed me to tap into that childhood love I had for it without a problem.
Like Burton’s Batman, this one does not focus too much of its time on boring origins. Batman’s past is further explored via an interesting flashback and emotional breakdown facilitated by Wayne’s relationship with the good doctor Chase Meridian (played by the ever-gorgeous Nicole Kidman). Was this where my love of Kidman began? If not, it’s definitely where it took shape and manifested itself fully formed. Anyway, enough about my origins… Two-Face’s origin is literally a 15-second flashback. Now that’s my kind of comic-film world building! The Riddler’s is a bit longer, but as Jim Carrey is already clearly crazy when we meet him, it doesn’t take him too long to take the full plunge. The meat of the story is how he slowly becomes the Riddler, sliding deeper and deeper into psychosis as he develops the ahead-of-its-time, brain-sucking version of 3D TV (as opposed to the currently available wallet-sucking version).
The two villains here feel very similar to Jack Nicholson’s portrayal of the Joker, with Two-Face filling in the wild gang leader wishing to create mayhem half, while Riddler takes up the humor reins. Some might call both performances too over the top, especially Carrey’s, but as they both fit the tone of the film so well, I will not add my voice to that ragged chorus. A lot of shit is also generally thrown at Val Kilmer’s take on Batman, but to this day I can’t see why. I have always thought he did a great job, and I continue to think so. In ways, I feel he’s preferable to Michael Keaton, and I love that the film has enough of a sense of humor to make the first shot of Batman feature a fucking spotlight on his mouth. I remember thinking as a child that Keaton’s mouth looked so perfect as Batman that I worried if another mouth could fill the cowl. Not only do they immediately address my childhood concern, Kilmer’s mouth more that fits the bill by evoking both the strength and the pouty charm that Batman lips demand.
But by far the biggest target of the shit-slingin’ by Internet yahoos is our director, one Joel Schumacher. I won’t lie, I’ve said some horrible things about Schumacher over the years (all before I had a blog, and especially during my film snob years), but I gotta say, his work in Batman Forever is absolutely commendable. Schumacher helped to reinvent Gotham into a neon-fueled, futuristic vision of a modern city that reflects the pages of a comic book incredibly well. Supposedly all those giant faces and statues of Atlas holding up the world were his idea as well, lending the film something of an old school sci-fi feel, yet still retaining the look of the now clichéd neon-infused future; imagine if Fritz Lang’s Metropolis and Blade Runner had a baby. It’s another instance of Gotham City not representing a single, recognizable timeline, but an idealized fantasy of what a city could be if you rebuilt it from the ground up as a mash-up of all your favorite things. Most importantly, Schumacher exhibits a lot of energy behind the camera, injecting intricate camera moves that employ a variety of techniques, from the simple sweeping crane, to the in-your-face fun of a harness-mounted Steadicam.
I’ll give you that Batman Forever is not a film for everyone, but it is a film for me. I don’t give a shit what anyone says, I had a ball watching this. Sure, it’s got that awful scene with Chris O’Donnell doing his laundry to some bullshit 90s rock song (which I’m sure was inspired by this scene from Yuen Biao’s Dreadnaught), but I laughed my ass off at it. It also has a lame Batmobile, but it drove up a wall so that kind of makes up for it. I won’t make excuses for Batman Forever, you either get it or you don’t. I guess you could say the same thing about Batman Returns, but this time around I got it.
And Don “The Dragon” Wilson is in it! Not that you’d notice him, but apparently he was the gang leader with the neon paint on his face. One of these days, man, I’m gonna
jump kick review the shit out of that Bloodfist series of his.
And next, of course, it’s Batman & Robin! I’ve only seen that one once and I really didn’t care for it, but that was before my love of B-Movies developed fully and I realized how intentionally comedic this series was. And Arnold! I can’t wait!
….. this film…..
is terrible, but huge fun. I don’t think Nicole Kidman has ever been sexier than she was in this, while Carrey overacts as The Riddler; my biggest caveat was Tommy Lee Jones as Two Face. I never really get why Jones has so much industry plaudits, to be honest – I found his work here truly crigeworthy, although part of that had to do with the make-up and scripting, I think, but he’s not even in the same film as everyone else, I think. Kilmer does a solid as Bats, but for me, this is where the franchise “jumped the shark” by having the Batmobile drive up THE SIDE OF A FUCKING BUILDING! Are you kidding me? No matter how many laws of physics a man in a bat suit can break and stretch credulity, there’s no way on Earth I’m buying the Batmobile just casually driving up the side of a highrise.
Then again, this is a film where Jim Carrey wore tight green spandex (or latex or whatever) for most of the last half of the film, and man, you ain’t seen nothing ’til you’ve seen Carreys skinny-ass package on a 50′ screen.
I disagree that it’s terrible, I think it’s about the same level of quality as the 89 Burton film. It just has such a different tone that I don’t think anyone was really expecting going in. I’ve seen it a billion times when I was a kid though, so this time through I was ready to go. It manages to be stupid fun and be well-made, which is usually hard to do. And I don’t know, I think Carrey and Jones are great as the villains, just as over the top as the whole movie is. And with the Batmobile going up a building, it did have some grapple line support so it’s totally do-able. It just feels so Batman to me, like the Batman of my youth, so I don’t care, I like it. And besides, these Batman films (the whole 89-97 series) aren’t about being realistic in my eyes; they’re going for a more realistic version of the Adam West series.
I think this film gets a worse rap than it deserves — in fact, I’m pretty sure it gets a lot of backlash retroactively because of Batman and Robin. If it weren’t for that film, people wouldn’t be so down on this one.
In my opinion, Batman Forever is a flawed film — but so is every other 80s/90s Batman film. It’s still a very fun film if one is willing to overlook the flaws, and they are easy to overlook. I’d say your score is right on the mark on this one.
Absolutely, the Internet is never kind to this movie and I just don’t get it. Beside the changed visual style with the addition of all the neon, it’s easily near the same quality as the ’89 Burton film. I wouldn’t be surprised if your theory of Batman and Robin spoiling people’s feelings on this one is correct. Schumacher will never will with the Internet crowd, but his work here is definitely good stuff. I also agree that any flaws here are easily overlooked in the name of a good time. Thanks!