The Expendables 3 (2014)

the-expendables-3-posterStarring Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Mel Gibson, Wesley Snipes, Kelsey Grammer, Antonio Banderas, Glen Powell, Victor Ortiz, Ronda Rousey, Kellan Lutz, Harrison Ford, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Dolph Lundgren, Randy Couture, Terry Crews, Jet Li, Ivan Kostadinov, Robert Davi

Directed by Patrick Hughes

Expectations: Low, but hopeful.

threestar


There’s no doubt that Expendables 3 received the worst critical reception of the franchise, and the general Internet scuttlebutt seemed to agree that Expendables 3 was bad. I let this influence me, and I pushed back seeing the film into the dreaded “sometime.” But now I have seen Expendables 3 and I can say without a hint of sarcasm or hyperbole that it is a great entry into the series. I love JCVD too much for it to surpass the 2nd film, but I definitely prefer it to the original. I’m curious what people didn’t like about it, actually. It’s basically just like the other two, only with even more people. And this one actually has some heart, too! [Note: The original two may have heart of their own, but I haven’t seen them in three years and all I remember are the cameos and the explosions.]

Storywise, this one is a bit convoluted to explain quickly due to its structure. It’s not actually convoluted, it’s just one of those movies with a slowly unfolding story that is easy to spoil if you break it down into a synopsis. So suffice it to say: there’s a bad guy that has done some evil shit, and Stallone and a varied cast of his Expendable buddies will be along for the ride to take him down. Besides, if you’re even remotely interested in this movie, that’s all you need to know. Are there explosions? Yes. Does Stallone & crew kick ass? Yes. Ticket sold. If you’re not that person and you’re still watching these movies, you might want to re-think your life because you’re clearly unable to learn from past mistakes.

expendables3_3[I’m going to ruthlessly spoil this movie’s thematic journey, and it’s a worthwhile journey if you have an affection for the ’80s glory days of action. There is also the chance that this review will make my love of ’80s action movies seem like a cult-like religion to anyone that doesn’t feel similarly.]

OK, so where was I? Oh yeah, I was talking about how Expendables 3 has heart, of all things. And, get this, it’s a good part of why I really enjoyed this one! I have a sneaking suspicion this is exactly why a lot of people didn’t like it, too, because it all hinges on the inclusion of the younger members of the team, although I should probably just try to explain my own feelings. Anyway, like a lot of these “old man action movies,” Expendables 3 makes sure you know that its stars are old… Stallone, in particular (who just turned 69!). There are mentions of him having a stroke, jokes about cancer, etc. You get the picture. He represents a dying breed, not just in the Expendables world, but in ours as well.

expendables3_1In the opening action scene — well, actually the action scene directly after the opening action scene 🙂 — one of the most important members of the team is gravely injured. Confronting the group’s mortality shakes Stallone to his core; this kind of thing never happened to his kind of heroes back in the day. The world is changing. He doesn’t want to see any more of his buddies in this condition, so he decides that instead of embracing the past like he’s been doing, he should ally himself with the new generation of mercenaries, which are truly expendable to him. This is all true of the Barney Ross character, but for me the real resonance comes when you think about these themes as they relate to Stallone himself, and the action genre as a whole.

expendables3_5So Stallone hunts down a tech-savvy team of modern upstarts to fill the boots of his veterans. These “kids” will do the job, and they will do it well, but their style is completely different. Their characters are all rather bland, and in this case I’ll chalk it up to the writers wishing to drive home how modern action stars are without any sort of on-screen persona. When you went to a Stallone or an Arnold movie back in the day, there was an attitude that oozed out of the screen from them. Their characters were larger than life, but their actions were still within the confines of reality. Now it has flip-flopped with the proliferation of CG: modern action characters are flat, lifeless and closer to reality, but their actions are wildly over the top and capable only in the realm of CG fantasy. This reflects the current generation, and how so many people are locked into computer screens playing fantastical video games and hiding behind avatars.

expendables3_7As you might expect, Expendables 3 brings these two sides together in the form of mutual respect. The “kids” learn that the ’80s way of doing things still gets the job done in thrilling fashion. When tanks start shelling the building you’re in, any kind of carefully planned strategy based on high-tech 3d blueprints goes out the window (and explodes). One of the modern characters (Kellen Lutz) is even tasked with a few on-screen “real-life” stunts on a dirt bike, showing that he has come to embrace the over-the-top ’80s method of hitting the enemy head-on, guns a-blazin’.

expendables3_6Likewise, the ’80s guys learn respect for the modern ways, because without them they’d all have been toast. There’s the obvious part when the super tech kid must use a wrist computer to “block the signal” to stop the C4 from exploding, but for me the culmination of this theme comes a bit later. In the climax, Stallone is placed into the position of running from the most ridiculous and wildly unbelievable “CG building disintegration that the character is just one step ahead of.” I chose to buy into it because my estimation of Stallone’s on-screen persona has basically led me to believe he can do anything, even within this clearly modern context. But regardless of whether I bought into it or not, for me it represented Stallone’s respect for the modern way of doing action films.

expendables3_2It was immensely satisfying to see these themes play out so well in a simple “blow shit up” film. Both groups of characters realize that they can never be anything but themselves, but that some adaptation to their basic principles isn’t necessarily a bad thing. And by God, the film’s final scene, which skillfully brought all of this together, nearly moved me to tears. Jason Statham says Stallone is like a father to them all and Stallone affectionately puts his arm around Statham, while the “kids” karaoke an expertly placed Old Man by Neil Young. In this moment, all my love for Stallone and Arnold and the ’80s action movie genre welled up inside me like a big ol’ slo-mo explosion. Expendables 3 not only entertained and satisfied, it actually made me love the heroes that defined ’80s action movies even more, which I didn’t think was physically possible.

expendables3_4These days I don’t really have time to review movies outside of my ongoing series, so if I had known that Arnold was only in Expendables 3 in a glorified cameo role I probably wouldn’t have watched it in my “reserved for reviewing” time, but I’m glad I did. Especially since so many people seem to dislike this movie. It’s definitely a long film, and it meanders a bit here and there, but it’s a grand tribute to the ’80s glory days. This would be a fantastic note to end the franchise on, but I’ll honestly be quite sad if Stallone doesn’t keep it going for at least one more.

Next up in this chronological journey through the films of Arnold Schwarzenegger is James Cameron’s True Lies! Didn’t I say that at the end of my Last Action Hero review? Well — I lied. See ya then!

5 comments to The Expendables 3 (2014)

  • So glad you loved this one too Will, it’s a guilty pleasure film for me – that final fight-n-gun sequence inside that ruined block of apartments is a home theater demo reel, for sure.

    • I don’t think there’s any need to be guilty about it, it’s a fun movie! I loved that final action scene. When I was getting screenshots for the review I found myself watching it again.

  • Bobby

    I hate, neigh, I actively loathe, with every fiber of my being, this entire god forsaken series. The first had action scenes that were too poorly lit to see properly, when it bothered to have action (don’t stop your movie for a pointless 15 minute monologue, no matter how well delivered), and its plot has so many holes I could probably find a few alternate dimensions there somewhere (the lady painting starts wat now? How come Lundgren is allowed back in at the end of the movie? Fucking stupid!!!), if I looked hard enough. Too many characters do nothing (if you cutout Rand Couture’s cauliflower ear speech he’d literally do nothing in the entire movie; the amazing Terry Crews only does something of note at the end).

    The first sequel is slightly better from an action standpoint, but has the dumber story (why should I give too shits about a younger member, that the audience has just been introduced to died? Killing off one of the characters from the first film would have at least had some real stakes and weight to it, excluding Couture, who again, did nothing). And then the have Chuck Norris in a stupid cameo just to make lame, and very dated Norris jokes. This isn’t good.

    So, then we get the third film, which again, introduces us to younger (potential) members. At least they don’t die, but if the point was to introduce us to newer blood, why kill off such a member in the second movie, when again, it had no weight behind it and the audience doesn’t care about him at all? Congratulations third film, you made all of the second movie remarkably pointless! Considering it already was, that is quite the feat. And on top of the already crowded market, we throw in yet even more big (ish) names to the mix, and each gets exactly one moment to do something, and nothing else. It’s pathetic and sad to watch these great action stars get no development and barely have character names.

    On top of that, Kellan Lutz is such a black hole of charisma that he is impossible to root for. In every movie I have seen him in, he has been hilariously bad, and this is no exception. So, the younger crowd has no one they can relate to/ root for/ like.

    Look, I was all for the first one- Stallone writing and directing (hot off the impressive one-two puch of “Rambo” & “Rocky Balboa”) an action film megaevent, awesome! It panned out like a bag of sandpaper to one’s privates though- uncomfortable, awkward, and nonsensical as to how that could even happen. And each entry just tries harder to up the star power, as opposed to the important things like characters, so each has diminished returns.

    And that my friend, is why “Expendables 3” is such a piece of crap.

  • Checked this one out, and like you I’m surprised at the poor reception. If you liked the first two, why on Earth would you not like part 3? It has everything good about the first two and then some. I certainly had a blast with it and think it’s the best of the three (although I don’t think it topped that opening scene of 2).

    This is the movie I was hoping for when I watched the first two. I can see your love of JCVD keeping 2 ahead of it, but I’m less attached to specific actors, so I don’t mind that.

    Spot on review, and I, too, hope we get a fourth film some day.

Leave a Reply! Comments are always much appreciated!