Starring Helen Slater, Faye Dunaway, Hart Bochner, Peter Cook, Brenda Vaccaro, Maureen Teefy, Marc McClure, Peter O’Toole, Mia Farrow, Simon Ward, David Healy
Directed by Jeannot Szwarc
Expectations: I’m so excited.
On the general scale:
On the B-movie scale:
The opening scene of Supergirl tries its best to liken itself to the opening scene of Superman, showing us a strange, alien world inhabited by humanoids much like ourselves. But where that original scene was interesting, the one in Supergirl falls a bit short. It does ostensibly perform the same task, though: setting up the canvas on which the rest of the film will be painted. For Superman, that canvas was grand and heroic, but for Supergirl, it’s campy, over-the-top and very much in the realm of B-Movies. One of my favorite phrases to repeat to myself while watching movies like Superman, Thor or The Avengers is, “This is cosmic done right!” Supergirl is most definitely “cosmic done wrong.” That doesn’t mean it doesn’t have its share of fun, but even by ’80s or B-Movie standards this is pretty lackluster.
Kara Zor-El (AKA Supergirl, AKA Linda Lee) is Superman’s cousin. She lives in a white sparkling place called Argo City, which is basically a chunk of the planet Krypton that survived the destruction of the planet. They don’t really explain it, I don’t really understand it, but that’s what it is. Oh, and apparently it’s under our ocean? That REALLY didn’t make sense to me, because they show Supergirl going through space to get to Earth and then she pops out of a lake on the studio backlot. So I guess that was supposed to be the deep, dark ocean she was going through. It did have a watery look at times. The lake part still doesn’t compute, though, especially given the film’s ending. Maybe they were trying to clumsily remind us of the adage that all streams lead to the ocean? I honestly don’t know. Anyway… Peter O’Toole steals the city’s power source (the Omegahedron!) because he’s a wascaly, wascaly wabbit, but through a bad chain of events Supergirl ends up losing the Omegahedron when it rockets out the city’s paper walls. Uh oh. So Supergirl jumps in the city’s diving pod in order to retrieve the power source, and thus our adventure begins. But, of course, the Omegahedron immediately falls into the hands of our villain, the evil witch Selena (Faye Dunaway), who uses it to quickly gain power and fulfill her dreams of world domination.
If Superman and Richard Donner’s version of Superman II proved anything, it’s that superhero films need some element of grounding and believability to work. Comic books are a medium that don’t require that, so many stories that lean hard into the fantastic immediately become challenging to adapt. But Donner wisely saw that trying to adapt the story beats of a comic story one-by-one were the wrong way to go. Mainstream audiences might have a light knowledge of the character, but most people don’t read or care about comics. They want to see stories they can relate to, and, in this case, fantastic things that they can believe in. Richard Lester had a different approach with his Superman II and Superman III, going as far into the comic camp of the genre as possible without totally destroying the film’s credibility (which he arguably still did anyway). But Supergirl goes even a few steps beyond Lester’s level of camp, turning up everything way past 11 and hoping for the best.
This isn’t necessarily a bad thing if the overall film is fun, but with Supergirl the story just isn’t there. Much of the movie drags like Superman trying to pull an anvil make of Kryptonite. Watching Hart Bochner under a love spell will only get you so far, even when you realize that it’s Harry Ellis from Die Hard, and you keep adding “Bubby” to everything he says. (I.E. “Marry me, Bubby.” “We’re from different worlds, Bubby.” or “Linda, Bubby, love makes everything possible.”) While Helen Slater performs admirably for an unknown in the role of Supergirl, everyone else in the movie is fairly annoying. Faye Dunaway does her best to ham it up something fierce, but she has no character arc and most of her scenes induce more head-shaking than those photos of Chinese dogs wearing pantyhose. So when the characters aren’t engaging, and the story is boring, even the best B-Movie thrills in the world will only raise your film up to average levels of entertainment.
Supergirl also doesn’t feel much of anything like any of the previous Superman films. Aside from the obvious tone differences, everything about this one feels a bit off. Maybe it’s just the boring, lesser quality cinematography, but this felt like a different, new universe instead of the one set up by the Donner film. Perhaps it was a subtle, clever attempt to do something with the Multiverse idea from DC? The only real connection to the old films is the Jimmy Olson character, who comes to town to hang out with Lucy Lane, Lois’s sister. (On a side note: does Jimmy Olsen ever change his clothes? It seems like in every film he’s always wearing the same vest and outfit.) It also would’ve been nice to see Christopher Reeve in a cameo (other than the lengthy, lingering shot on the poster of him in Lucy Lane’s dorm room).
Along with Superman III and Superman IV, Supergirl was one of the Superman films I saw over and over as a child. It wasn’t any conscious choice on my part, it was simply what was available to me. But for some reason, I had a hard time recalling much of the film. It would seem that even as a child who enjoyed the film, I zoned out through a lot of it. But this time around, even through all the harsh words and the hammy acting, I did enjoy a good portion of Supergirl. When it stops talking and goes into its light heroics, I found it pretty enjoyable in a B-Movie way. The ending confrontation is something that I can’t believe got past the first re-write stage of the script, but I’m glad it did because it’s the kind of batshit-crazy movie magic that could only come out of the ’80s. There’s also a fantastic scene of ’80s electricity, which, if you didn’t already know, is without a doubt the best kind of electricity.
I can’t call Supergirl a fun movie to watch, though, as it’s much more annoying and drawn-out than it needs to be. The most egregious of these scenes is the fan service section within the Phantom Zone, which probably looked a lot better on paper than it does on film. I will say that this part of the movie is chock full of lines and visual cues that are perfect fodder for sexually themed MST3K-style riffing, though, so that did provide a fair amount of enjoyment. But Supergirl is more a test of your will to sit through the boring garbage to get to something mildly enjoyable than anything else. That’s kind of the way a lot of B-Movies work, though, so if you’re already attuned to that frequency, check it out… maybe?
This was one of the first movies I watched for my site, and it ranks right at the bottom of the Superman-related movies right alongside Superman 3 & 4. It was very fun and campy, but also cheesy and ridiculous. Especially with Faye Dunaway chewing scenery with a spotlight on her face in every scene. It had its moments, but it was mostly just junky.
Yeah, this is easily the worst of this series. I haven’t seen Superman Returns yet, though, so fingers crossed it’s at least better than this. 3 & 4 are both much more entertaining and coherent than this, in their own ways.
Awww, man, you treat this film so harshly….. wait…. oh yes, it deserved it. Fair enough.
Like you, this was one of the earlier Superman themed films I saw as a youngster, and I remember it being better than it was when I watched it later as an adult. Funny how your mind plays tricks like that, eh? Key for me was Fay Dunaway – I though she was awesome as a kid, but now I think her portrayal of that awful witch character was truly diabolical – not to mention her offsiders, the names of whom I’m not even bothering to remember because they were so odious. I really thought Helen Slater was perfectly cast as Supergirl: she had the look, the poses and the ability to portray the character, she was just let down (badly) by a terrible script, even worse direction, and a story that just felt like a trek across broken glass. Evey step was just agony.
Admittedly, there are moments that are still pretty cool – the invisible lightning creature (which you alluded to) is terrific, and the bit where Supergirl rips the front off the loaders is okay….. but the rest of it is all a bit stupid.
I hate to admit it, but this review is right on the money on this one…. I really wanted Supergirl to be a great film, but alas, it was not to be….
Well, when I was a kid I was watching the theatrical version which was 20 minutes shorter, so that probably helped. The only readily available version these days is the “International version” AKA the version that was supposed to be released before Warner Brothers got scared and pulled out of their distribution deal. Tri Star came in, edited out 20 minutes and released it. So with this version I was finally able to see “the film as intended” which was pretty lackluster. It’s hard to believe that the producers could drive the series into the ground so willingly and quickly, but boy did they! The script is probably this one’s biggest offense.
But yeah, Helen Slater does a great job and definitely looks the part. I like that they went with another unknown, hoping to have a Christopher Reeve effect.
Saw this a few years ago… I’ve got the VHS somewhere… anyway, you’re pretty much spot-on. It’s campy, it’s silly, it’s not very good on any objective scale, but it’s still kind of fun.
Also, if they ever do a new Supergirl movie, they’ll need to find someone who can look as good in the spandex as Helen Slater did.
Yeah, there are definitely worse ones out there, but this is pretty hard to sit through at times.
I doubt they’ll do another, but I’m open to the idea for sure. I really want Man of Steel to do well so that DC can try their hand at what Marvel’s doing.