Starring Shia LaBeouf, Tom Hardy, Jason Clarke, Guy Pearce, Jessica Chastain, Mia Wasikowska, Dane DeHaan, Chris McGarry, Tim Tolin, Gary Oldman, Lew Temple, Marcus Hester
Directed by John Hillcoat
Expectations: Low.
There is such a thing as “too star-studded.” I’m sure on paper Lawless looked like a sure-fire winner. With a cast like this how could it fail? Apparently, it can fail in numerous ways! It’s a shame because a lot of the production design is well-realized, and the locations look great. Director John Hillcoat’s camera often finds a nice image to linger on, the only problem is that the majority of these images aren’t artistically deep or resonant to the overall film, they’re the wide establishing shots. Lawless is the cinematic equivalent to one of my friend’s favorite Raymond Chandler lines (from the novel The High Window), “From 30 feet away she looked like a lot of class. From 10 feet away she looked like something made up to be seen from 30 feet away.”
The story that Lawless tells is apparently based on the true story of three outlaw, moonshinin’ brothers in Franklin County, Virginia. Like all outlaw stories, they start small and their business gets increasingly bigger over the course of the film. Of course, there’s a detective gunning for the brothers’ business (played by Guy Pearce), but Pearce’s guide for the character must have been Jeffrey Combs in The Frighteners because this dude is like a goddamn comic book villain. Anyway, they go back and forth throughout, and every once in a while Gary Oldman comes in to look badass.
The elements of a good movie are definitely here, but Lawless is so unfocused and boring that the most pressing thing on your mind while watching will be how much sleep you need to catch up on from the previous night. I can understand hiring Gary Oldman if you can get him in your movie, but in a role so small it doesn’t make a lot of sense. Especially when he makes his first appearance at the opening of the film, in something of a glorified shot that suggests he will be a central character. While he does contribute to the brothers’ business expansion, the character could have been completely removed and no one would have noticed. What’s strange about this is that Oldman’s scenes were my favorites of the film, so I guess I can understand the filmmaker’s inability to cut them.
While I was working through my boredom, I tried to figure out who this movie was aimed at. The only thing I could come up with is someone who might sympathize or relate in some way to Shia LaBeouf’s character, whoever that is. The film doesn’t really have a main character for most of the film, but Shia eventually emerges from the dust as our lead. Even then, he’s far from interesting and he’s a dick so it’s hard to care about him. Perhaps the only really intriguing idea on-screen is the legend of the three brothers among the townspeople. They believe them to be invincible, thanks mostly to Tom Hardy’s ability to come back from literally any wound. I have to wonder if this is where the creative license of “Based on a True Story” comes in, because some of this shit is really over the top. But whatever, even if they were unbelievable, these extreme moments were far and away the most engaging thing about Lawless.
This review was supposed to go up last week, but when it came time to edit it I just couldn’t bring myself to read or think about this movie. I purposefully put it off a week. Lawless carries a lot of promise in its cast and its premise, but it is wildly underwhelming. I know there’s potential for a good, modern prohibition movie, but this definitely isn’t it. I guess I’ll just have to stick with The Public Enemy.
One day, long from now, the stellar career of Shearer LaBuff will be retold to young children much like Disney told us about a lion who grew up to be a king. Vastly underappreciated in his time, it was only in his declining years as an actor that he began to receive accolades he never got through his youth, even with the nodding approval of A-list directors such as Michael Bay and…. the dude who directed Eagle Eye.
Who am I kidding.
I’m keen to see this just for Chastain’s boobs. Apparently they’re better actors (or should they be actresses?) than Shearer LaBuff.
Hahahaha, I doubt that. Shia’s not so much bad here, he’s just unlikable. And the rest of the movie doesn’t help him out much.
There are easier ways to see titties, Rodney. Ones that don’t involve slogging through a horrid film. It’s not worth it. 🙂
I’m glad you wrote this review. I originally gave Lawless a 7.5 or something when it came out, but have since reconsidered that score. I agree that the film really has no focus, and it jumps around a bit too much. There are also stretches that drag on and it’s hard to care about these seemingly immortal characters. I think the first initial viewing had me really liking it was because of the built-in sincerity of the actors. Shia and Hardy, for instance, come into the thing right off of the bat with us caring for them, simply because of who they are. But once you realize the characters are pretty shallow, you can just forget it.
I wanted to like it, I really did. Tom Hardy is the best thing about it, but yeah, all the characters are so shallow. It’s just so frustrating because it feels like all the elements are there to make a good movie, but they just dropped the ball.
This movie really disappointed me. I wanted it to be better. You’re spot on when you say it had no focus. I actually wanted to slap Bane’s mask back on Tom Hardy because I couldn’t understand a damn word he was saying through out the film. He was more audible as Bane.
Hahahahaha! You’re so right! He was much more understandable with the Bane mask! Ah geez, I had forgotten about all the mumbling, yet another fault of this poor film.
Loved the cast, loved the action, and loved the look, but I just didn’t love the pace. Too slow at times and could have been sped up just a bit. Great review Will.
Thanks, Dan! Definitely needed something, a better pace would be a good start.