Directed by Geoff Murphy
Expectations: Low. I’ve seen this one before and did not enjoy it. Same as the first.
I love a good western. I don’t watch nearly as many of them as I used to, but my love for them has not diminished one bit. Young Guns did nothing to scratch my western itch, and while its sequel gets a lot closer, it’s just shy of providing anything of real value or entertainment to me. I think the key here is that the target audience for the Young Guns franchise is female, and when my girlfriend remarked after one of my many sighs, “You don’t like all the drama,” I knew that she was onto something solid.
By casting all the young heartthrobs of the day, you’ve already got the female audience’s interest piqued, but Young Guns goes the extra mile and makes the focus of the movie the drama that transpires between the members of the group. There’s no real heroics or impressive vigilante action to be found in this series (things that a male audience would generally respond to), and I think this is a major reason why I just can’t connect with the Young Guns films. In this way, Young Guns isn’t so much a western as it is a teen movie using a western backdrop, kind of like Inglourious Basterds is a spaghetti western that uses WWII iconography instead of the traditional guns and horses.
While Murphy does fill the film with many great shots, they worked on me in a way that was not intended. By having vistas that recalled better westerns, specifically the iconic work of John Ford, my mind wandered to his many films featuring John Wayne, and then continuing into the idea of reviewing some of those and what the poster might look like if I made it into some sort of Wayne Fest. I’m not actually going to do that, but it gives a good picture of how engaged I was with the film at hand. This was about halfway through, which is much better than minute 15 for Young Guns, but any film that I lose interest in, in such a complete way, just isn’t my kind of movie.
I also enjoyed Lou Diamond Philips quite a bit. His acting was a little too serious for my tastes, but I’m a sucker for the clichéd “spirit world” talk that nearly every one of his dialogue exchanges contains. His best line comes early on when he states that, “When the spirit horse comes, then it’s over.” In case you missed it that time, he brings up that old spirit horse every chance he gets, making sure that everyone in the audience, even the ones that tuned the movie out long ago, will understand what inevitably happens to his character at the end of the film.
You also get a couple of scenes with James Coburn that are great, as well as a few with future star Viggo Mortenson. While Coburn’s presence livens up the middle of the film, he’s too good for this movie and it only reiterates the fact that this film is mostly populated by actors that have no business being in a western… at least any western that I’m watching! The worst of the bunch, for me, was Christian Slater. I’ve never really liked him and because he’s the same in nearly everything, I didn’t think his cocky, misunderstood teen schtick really added anything to the film.
Through all of this negativity, Young Guns II is a huge step up in quality from the first film. Despite still being disjointed and somewhat poorly constructed, it’s such an improvement over the abysmal original that I have to call it a success (in terms of the series only). It also manages to let me know what the first film was all about in a couple of quick lines of dialogue, something the entire first film failed to do. I don’t know, this one feels like a film you’ll still love if you loved it in 1990, but anyone that didn’t see it then should probably steer clear unless you’re big on blatant heartthrob string-pulling films, in which case Young Guns II will definitely provide you with some entertainment.
What was that? I think that was my spirit horse whinnying, so I guess that means this review is over.