Starring James Franciscus, Karl Malden, Catherine Spaak, Horst Frank, Aldo Reggiani, Carlo Alighiero, Rada Rassimov, Tom Felleghy, Emilio Marchesini, Ugo Fangareggi
Directed by Dario Argento
Expectations: High. I’m pumped after watching his début. I hope this is good.
Hot off the tails of The Bird with the Crystal Plumage, Dario Argento concocts another horror mystery thriller to get you on the edge of your seat. That was the intention anyway. Unfortunately, The Cat o’ Nine Tails is a step back in every way, and ends up being a much less satisfying film for it. That’s not to say that it’s horrible though, it’s definitely something worth sitting down with. Just don’t expect to be enthralled every minute. The film has a bad rap with fans, critics and even Dario Argento himself, who has called it his least favorite of his films. I honestly feel that the hate is a bit misguided, as this really isn’t all that bad of a movie.
If The Bird with the Crystal Plumage was a new director showing off his passion and energy through great camerawork and a fun story, then The Cat o’ Nine Tails is that same director feeling bored and somewhat detached from his story. When I go through a director’s work, I expect to eventually run into a film where it’s obvious they phoned it in. I really didn’t expect it to be Argento’s second film though! The film at times feels like an American production trying to duplicate the success of Argento’s first film, which is an odd sort of feel to have. Some of this can be attributed to the presence of Karl Malden, but most of it is probably the fact that the cinematography is far less striking and defined as it was in the prior film. It’s not really fair to hold them against each other, but realistically if this was Argento’s first film, he would not have created a sensation that rippled throughout the entire Italian film industry. It’s almost as if that success went to his head. Anyway, in The Cat o’ Nine Tails Argento chooses to reuse a lot of the major camera tricks used to great effect in the prior film. On one hand you could say he’s establishing a style and just “being himself.” I’d like to believe that, but that theory only works if both films use the techniques well.
Karl Malden does well in one of the hardest roles in film to pull off well, the blind guy. James Franciscus is also good as his partner in solving crime. As this is a 70s Italian film, it’s all dubbed per the shooting style of the day, but to my ears the dubbing was done really well. I generally wouldn’t even comment on this fact, but after quickly looking at Leonard Maltin’s book, I felt that I needed to put my two cents in. For the record, Maltin gave this the coveted BOMB rating and noted how the dubbing was especially terrible.
Argento once again goes with a Hitchcock-styled film for his sophomore feature but with decidedly less than Hitchcock results. Despite its many flaws, I still liked The Cat o’ Nine Tails. The scenes that impress are damn good and it’s a shame that it gets so bogged down by the weight of the many characters it unsuccessfully juggles. Genre fans will definitely want to check it out for the death scenes though, as they are excellent. They aren’t very bloody, but they still manage to be incredibly brutal. Cautiously recommended to fans of Argento and the genre, all others will most likely be unimpressed and bored.
The horror train keeps on rollin’ tomorrow as Uncle Jasper chimes in with a review of Santo in the Wax Museum!